A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

“Save Money. Live Better.” Just another Wal-Mart lie!

Yes, I realize it is probably the corporation everyone in this country loves to hate, but it is so easy to hate Wal-Mart. I am not a huge Wal-Mart basher and do shop there occasionally, although it seems like every time I do shop there it is a negative experience.

Anyway, I find their now slogan “Save Money, Live Better” to be a bit ironic based on this story that came out on  The word is that Wal-Mart will now limit customers to 10 manufacturer coupons per order. While this likely only affects a small portion of their customers, this is pretty offensive to the smart consumer that is trying to “Save Money” and “Live Better”. Manufacturer coupons are a great way to save money. Although I don’t do coupons nearly as much as I used to, I will still cut out coupons for items I know we will use. As a casual coupon user it isn’t uncommon for me to have 20 or even 25 coupons for my trip to the grocery store. And now Wal-Mart is going to tell me that I can’t use all of my valid manufacturer coupons in their stores? Screw you, Wal-Mart!

I don’t quite understand the logic behind this move for a company that claims it is providing a better standard of living for millions of Americans through its lower prices. Any retailer accepting a manufacturer coupon is reimbursed for the full value of the coupons redeemed, plus a small handling charge for each. The only added expenses to the retailer are having to gather the coupons and submit them to the coupon clearinghouses and the added time for the cashiers to scan the coupons presented. It isn’t like Wal-Mart is paying for the coupon discount themselves. The only plausible theories I can come up with are that it is an effort to speed up their notoriously slow check-out lines (you know, the three out of 30 that are actually open) or that they have figured out that either because of poor training or poor intellectual ability their cashiers aren’t able to figure out what to do with the coupons.

This is just the latest anti-consumer action by Wal-Mart. I remember being offended a few years ago when they ran ads talking about how customers could save money with having to clip coupons (God forbid!), as if those of us who did were the modern-day equivalent of lepers or something. And don’t get me started about their poor customer service (store-level or when contacting corporate) or their price matching non-policy (“We’ll honor any competitor’s advertised price”, unless that competitor is more than 1500 yards away from our store, requires the use of a free frequent shopper card, or actually has a price cheaper than ours). And of course for the few coupons you are allowed to redeem be ready for a fight since it seems like most of their cashiers don’t quite understanding that a coupon can be valid for an item described with words and not included in the pretty picture on the coupon.

As a country we have been brainwashed into thinking that Wal-Mart is always cheaper on everything, but if you compare prices to Target or your local grocery store you may be surprised at just how small a difference in price there really is. Take into account the poor customer service, the time it takes to get through the checkout line, and the anti-consumer policies, and you may just find it is costing you more to shop at Wal-Mart than you actually save.

3 comments to “Save Money. Live Better.” Just another Wal-Mart lie!

  • wes m

    I’ve finally quit going to Wal-Mart, and now primarily shop at Kroger and Target. Frankly, I’m just tired of Wal-Mart being continually packed (yes, that “obviously” means they’re doing something right), notoriously slow and, in many but not all instances, just plain rude. Kroger is smaller but still carries what I want, and actually STAFFS their checkout line. No, self checkout does NOT count, and I love the things. Why doesn’t it count? Wal-Mart, along with Albertsons, has cranked up the “anti-theft” measures on their machines so high, they are unusable. “UNEXPECTED ITEM IN BAGGING AREA” if I mistakenly set an ad or a magazine somewhere the computer doesn’t expect is just one of my favorites.

    My only wish is that Wal-Mart hadn’t done such an effective job of beating the crap out of other grocers in the N. Texas market, and Kroger still remained open 24 hours. If they’d do that, I’d never have a reason to go to Wal-Mart ever again. (Heck, even now I check the nearby 24 hour CVS before hitting up wally world)

  • Marie

    I very rarely shop at Walmart because I find that if I follow the sales in our local grocery stores the prices are normally better.

  • To your point, Wes, I am very thankful the Houston market still has a pretty competitive for grocers. Kroger and Randalls (Safeway) still do very well, as does HEB. There are a number of smaller local players along with grocers targeting the Hispanic market as well. I typically find the traditional grocers are relatively competitive with WM on price, and frequently beat WM prices for sale items.

    This is stark contrast to my hometown of Baton Rouge, LA. Walmart essentially killed all the other grocers in town. Winn-Dixie is struggling, and Sav-A-Center and Albertson’s have all but pulled out of the city. A few other players like Delchamps and Schwegmann’s (there’s a blast from the past!) pulled out earlier, although their issues were attributable to more than just Walmart. There are a couple of very small independent grocers, but for many areas of the city Walmart is the only viable option, and it is reflected in the prices. Amazingly the Walmarts that do have another grocer nearby are significantly cheaper than the ones where they are the only one around.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>